NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Firearm Manufacturers

by
posted on January 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
NRA ILA Logo

NRA filed an amicus brief supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific public shooting.

The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment, and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

Pulsar Thermion Lede
Pulsar Thermion Lede

Hardware Review: Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XL60

Simply put, thermal weapon sights represent the greatest technological advantage a hunter or home protector can have since the advent of the firearm itself. The Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF is a great example. Check out Jeff Johnston's Hardware Review of it here.

American Made: What’s New at Griffin & Howe?

The classic brand is once again thriving in New Jersey, offering a hosts of products, services and even courses.

#SundayGunday: Heritage Manufacturing Model 92

On this week's #SundayGunday, we’re diving into a rifle that blends classic American design with modern manufacturing: the Heritage Model 92 lever-action. This gun pays homage to one of the most iconic lever-actions ever created, John Browning’s legendary Model 92. Learn more about it in this exclusive video.

Premium Upland Loads: Worth the Price?

Not all shotshells are created equal. “Premium” loads offer elevated performance at a cost, but are they necessary? To find out, continue reading.

Benelli Ultimate Holiday Giveaway

Benelli and GunBroker.com have partnered to launch Benelli’s Win a Gun for Every Season Holiday Giveaway by GunBroker.

Know How: Hunting Fall Turkeys with your Dog

Curious about hunting fall turkeys with your dog? Join Scott Haugen as he runs through the process and tactics.

Interests



Get the best of American Hunter delivered to your inbox.